Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Software Validation Plan

By
To be prepared is half the victory
-Miguel de Cervantes

What is a Validation Plan?

A validation plan describes the approach and responsible parties for validating a system within its operating environment. The "system" could be a piece of manufacturing equipment, a manufacturing process, or a computerized system. The key elements of a validation plan include:

  • 
The scope of work - the Validation Plan identifies both the system and its component elements to be validated and the required documentation
  • The responsibilities - the Validation Plan identifies the roles and specific responsibilities of the parties responsible for validating the system
  • The approach - the Validation Plan outlines the strategy for validating the system within its operating environment. The approach is generally bounded by the standards, procedures, and methodologies of the executing organization.
A Validation Plan is required whenever significant changes are made to facilities, equipment or processes affect the quality of a product.

How is a Validation Plan different from the Validation Master Plan?

A Validation Master Plan (VMP), sometimes called a Master Validation Plan (MVP), is the basis for the validation program within an organization. It should include process validation, facility and utility qualification and validation, equipment qualification, cleaning and computerized system validation.

A Validation Plan is specific to one of the elements within the Validation Master Plan. For instance, a new biotechnology manufacturing plant will require a Validation Master Plan that addresses everything from the facility and utilities to the manufacturing equipment and processes, including the computerized systems that measure, record, process, or store quality data related to the product. Each element will require its own detailed Validation Plan, i.e., every piece of manufacturing equipment, every process, and every computerized system will be covered by a Validation Plan.

How is a Validation Plan different from the Project Plan?

In a previous post (Validation is a Parallel Process, Not a Parallel Universe), I mapped the validation activities and deliverables associated with computerized system validation (sometimes referred to as software validation) to the system development life cycle (SDLC). With the exception of a few items, most of the deliverables are already part of the SDLC. These deliverables define the scope of a validated SDLC project and one of the three parts of the project management triple constraints of cost, time, and scope.
Triple constraint
(For a nice discussion of how to manage the triple constraint, please read Tom Tsongas' blog entry Scope, Time and Cost – Managing the Triple Constraint.) It is important to note that when scope is equated with quality (as in discussions of the triple constraint), quality is used in the sense of the NUMBER of requirements rather than in the sense of MEETING requirements. In other words, more requirements means higher quality (with the implication that all requirements are met).

With regard to the other two concerns of project management, the validation plan only addresses them tangentially. Cost is not a direct concern of the validation plan. However, in that a significant part of the cost of a project may come from the labor of the resources involved, the roles identified in the validation plan should also be addressed in the project plan. But the validation plan doesn't go so far as to articulate an organizational breakdown structure or labor rates.

Time is also not a direct concern of the validation plan. It does not include a work breakdown structure or any estimates of task/activity duration. In fact, the schedule of validation activities is not specifically addressed in the validation plan and as I pointed out in my blog post, these activities follow the SDLC.

Why is a Validation Plan required?

So if a Validation Plan overlaps the scope of a project plan, but does not address the cost or the schedule of validation, what good is it? Some of the value of a validation plan simply comes from its form as a narrative version of the project deliverables. While most of the "form" of a validation plan is captured in a template (for example, the Validation Plan Template in the Toolbox in the sidebar), this form explains the purpose of each deliverable required for validation and places them in context of the methodology, SOPs, Document Management, and Change Control of the executing organizations Quality Management System (QMS).

The validation plan also functions as a catalog of al the documents required to demonstrate the system was validated and how it will be maintained in a validated state. As such, it forms the basis for the Validation Summary Report (VSR), which records the actual results of the validation versus the approved plan.

However, the primary value of the validation plan is as a record of management's intention to validate the system. Once the document is approved and signed it becomes a controlled quality record that is placed in the record management system of the executing organization and is available for audits.

How is a Validation Plan created?

A Validation Plan is not so much created as it is tailored from a template provided by the executing organization. The template itself should be consistent with the QMS and methodologies of the executing organization. Generally, the organization responsible for Quality or Validation will provide this level of tailoring.

The next step of tailoring is based on the scope of validation - in other words the boundaries between the system being validated and its operating environment. (See my previous post What is a computerized system? for an explanation of this boundary.) The boundaries and responsibilities for the various elements will drive the content of the validation plan. Elements may be combined in a single validation plan or segregated into separate validation plans. As an example, in the Toolbox in the sidebar I have a link to the International Society of Pharmaceutical Engineers (ISPE) that provides an example of a validation template for equipment. And on a recent engagement, I developed a Validation Plan Template that allocated responsibilities for validation software as a service in the cloud among the cloud tenants, the cloud service provider, and the infrastructure hosting vendor.

And finally, the last step in tailoring is to identify by name every document that will be required for validating the system.

12 comments:

  1. The approache is generally bounded by the standards, preceders,and methodologiec of the exctuing organization.automateandvalidate

    ReplyDelete
  2. In software project management, software testing, and software engineering, verification and validation (V&V) is the process of checking that a software system meets specifications and that it fulfills its intended purpose. It may also be referred to as software quality control. It is normally the responsibility of software testers as part of the software development lifecycle.


    www.automateandvalidate.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. The key elements of a validation plan include mainly Three services and that is
    The scope of work,The responsibilities,The approach..
    such a good technique...

    ReplyDelete
  4. cost, time, and scope are the most important part of project management. You’re probably well aware of what project management software. can do for you, but if you’ve ever tried it, you know how great it is and how well organized it can keep you. Because your projects are important to the development of your company, it’s vital that you have a proper plan and people in place. This is why project management software serves you well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The FDA guidance does not prescribe specific practices, tools, coding methods or any other technical activity. The FDA, instead, prescribes the seemingly innocuous concept of the Least Burdensome Approach. In this approach, organizations determine, and strictly adhere to their self-defined validation and verification processes.click here

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just wanted to comment your blog and say that I really enjoyed reading your blog post here.
    It was very informative and I also digg the way you write!I also provide this service u can visit my site.

    software validation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. This applies not only during the IQ, OQ and PQ validation phases, but far earlier,
      beginning with the first meeting, and continuing through analysis of your process.
      Software validation is a part of the design validation for a finished device,
      but is not separately defined in the Quality System regulation.

      software validation

      Delete
  7. I really like examining and also following ones write-up when i locate them incredibly beneficial and also fascinating.
    That write-up is usually just as beneficial along with fascinating.Verification and Validation both are independent type of testing. Obviously,
    If we look both of these activities as a whole, we can also call it testing.

    equipment validation
    labview programming
    software validation

    ReplyDelete

  8. In software project management, software testing, and software engineering,
    verification and validation is the process of checking that a software system meets specifications and that it fulfills its intended purpose.
    It may also be referred to as software quality control.

    software validation

    ReplyDelete

  9. Verification and Validation are the activities performed to improve the quality and reliability of the system and assure the product satisfies the customer needs.
    Verification assures the product of each development phase meets their respective requirements.
    Validation assures the final product meets the client requirements.



    software validation


    ReplyDelete
  10. Valuable information ..I am delighted to read this article..thank you for giving us this useful information.

    it project plan template

    ReplyDelete